GRID M10-2B vs Quadro 5010M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-2B vs Quadro 5010M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-2B vs Quadro 5010M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-2B

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Quadro 5010M

2011

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 5010M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (1,691 vs 1,644), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-2B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M10-2B makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro 5010M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID M10-2B vs Quadro 5010M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-2B

The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.

Quadro 5010M

The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-2B scores 1,644 and the Quadro 5010M reaches 1,691 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro 5010M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2B) vs 384 (Quadro 5010M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M).

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro 5010M
G3D Mark Score	1,644	1,691+3%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2048+433%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+598%	0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	768 KB	768 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro 5010M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-2B has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5010M carries 4 GB. Quadro 5010M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-2B and 64-bit on the Quadro 5010M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 5010M) — the GRID M10-2B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro 5010M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-2B draws 225W versus the Quadro 5010M's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro 5010M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2B) vs 350W (Quadro 5010M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro 5010M
TDP	225W	100W-56%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	7.3	16.9+132%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID M10-2B (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro 5010M
MSRP	$2500	—
Codename	GM204	GF110
Release	August 30 2015	February 22 2011
Ranking	#433	#733

Search GRID M10-2B on Amazon

Search Quadro 5010M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.