GRID M10-2B vs Radeon RX Vega 9

GRID M10-2B

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 9

2017Boost: 1300 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID M10-2B vs Radeon RX Vega 9 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-2B vs Radeon RX Vega 9: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-2B

2015

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon RX Vega 9 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID M10-2B is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 2425.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,500 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 16.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.

Radeon RX Vega 9

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,401 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 2451.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.8 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega 9 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (1,661 vs 1,644), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M10-2B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX Vega 9 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,401 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2451.4% (16.8 vs 0.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon RX Vega 9 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-2B has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-2B vs Radeon RX Vega 9 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-2B

The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 9

The Radeon RX Vega 9 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 1300 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,661 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-2B scores 1,644 and the Radeon RX Vega 9 reaches 1,661 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 9 uses Vega, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2B) vs 576 (Radeon RX Vega 9). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1300 MHz.

FeatureGRID M10-2BRadeon RX Vega 9
G3D Mark Score
1,644
1,661+1%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Vega
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+256%
576
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1300 MHz+10%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M10-2BRadeon RX Vega 9
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-2B has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 9 carries 0 MB. GRID M10-2B gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-2B and System on the Radeon RX Vega 9.

FeatureGRID M10-2BRadeon RX Vega 9
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-2B draws 225W versus the Radeon RX Vega 9's 15W — a 175% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 9 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2B) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 9). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGRID M10-2BRadeon RX Vega 9
TDP
225W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Perf/Watt
7.3
110.7+1416%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-2B came in at $2500, while the Radeon RX Vega 9 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 9 was 96% cheaper ($2401 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (GRID M10-2B) vs 16.8 (Radeon RX Vega 9) — the Radeon RX Vega 9 offers 2300% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 9 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID M10-2BRadeon RX Vega 9
MSRP
$2500
$99-96%
Performance per Dollar
0.7
16.8+2300%
Codename
GM204
Vega Raven Ridge
Release
August 30 2015
October 26 2017
Ranking
#433
#670

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.