GRID M10-2B vs Quadro P400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-2B vs Quadro P400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-2B vs Quadro P400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-2B

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1379.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 9.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌650% higher power demand at 225W vs 30W.

Quadro P400

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1392.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.8 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 225W, a 195W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (1,659 vs 1,644), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-2B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,331 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1392.8% (9.8 vs 0.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M10-2B has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M10-2B vs Quadro P400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-2B

The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.

Quadro P400

The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-2B scores 1,644 and the Quadro P400 reaches 1,659 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P400 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2B) vs 256 (Quadro P400). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1252 MHz.

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro P400
G3D Mark Score	1,644	1,659
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+700%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+653%	0.641 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	1252 MHz+6%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+700%	16
L1 Cache	768 KB+700%	96 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro P400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-2B has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P400 carries 2 GB. Quadro P400 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-2B and 64-bit on the Quadro P400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro P400) — the GRID M10-2B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro P400
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-2B draws 225W versus the Quadro P400's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2B) vs 350W (Quadro P400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro P400
TDP	225W	30W-87%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	145mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	7.3	55.3+658%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M10-2B came in at $2500, while the Quadro P400 launched at $169. On MSRP, Quadro P400 was 93.2% cheaper ($2331 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (GRID M10-2B) vs 9.8 (Quadro P400) — the Quadro P400 offers 1300% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P400 (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro P400
MSRP	$2500	$169-93%
Performance per Dollar	0.7	9.8+1300%
Codename	GM204	GP107
Release	August 30 2015	February 7 2017
Ranking	#433	#741

Search GRID M10-2B on Amazon

Search Quadro P400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.