
GRID M10-2B vs Quadro P400

GRID M10-2B
Popular choices:

Quadro P400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-2B is positioned at rank 372 and the Quadro P400 is on rank 143, so the Quadro P400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2B
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-2B.
| Insight | GRID M10-2B | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P400 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $80), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 34.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-2B | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+34.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-2B and Quadro P400

GRID M10-2B
The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.

Quadro P400
The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-2B scores 1,644 and the Quadro P400 reaches 1,659 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P400 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2B) vs 256 (Quadro P400). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1252 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,644 | 1,659 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+700% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+653% | 0.641 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1252 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+700% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+700% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-2B comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P400 has 2 GB. The Quadro P400 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro P400) — the GRID M10-2B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-2B draws 225W versus the Quadro P400's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2B) vs 350W (Quadro P400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 30W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.3 | 55.3+658% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-2B launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Quadro P400 launched at $169 and now averages $60. The Quadro P400 costs 25% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.6 (GRID M10-2B) vs 27.6 (Quadro P400) — the Quadro P400 offers 34% better value. The Quadro P400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $169-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $60-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.6 | 27.6+34% |
| Codename | GM204 | GP107 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #433 | #741 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















