
GRID M10-2B vs Quadro K3000M

GRID M10-2B
Popular choices:

Quadro K3000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-2B is positioned at rank 372 and the Quadro K3000M is on rank 79, so the Quadro K3000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2B
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K3000M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-2B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K3000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID M10-2B | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID M10-2B remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-2B and Quadro K3000M

GRID M10-2B
The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.

Quadro K3000M
The Quadro K3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 654 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $155.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-2B scores 1,644 and the Quadro K3000M reaches 1,618 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro K3000M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2B) vs 576 (Quadro K3000M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.7534 TFLOPS (Quadro K3000M).
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,644+2% | 1,618 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+256% | 576 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+540% | 0.7534 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+1500% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-2B comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K3000M has 2 GB. The Quadro K3000M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K3000M) — the GRID M10-2B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-2B draws 225W versus the Quadro K3000M's 75W — a 100% difference. The Quadro K3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2B) vs 350W (Quadro K3000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 7.3 | 21.6+196% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-2B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | GK104 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #433 | #748 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















