GRID M10-2B vs Quadro K3000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M10-2B vs Quadro K3000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M10-2B vs Quadro K3000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M10-2B

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quadro K3000M

2012

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M10-2B is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,644 vs 1,618), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M10-2B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M10-2B makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GRID M10-2B vs Quadro K3000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M10-2B

The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.

Quadro K3000M

The Quadro K3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 654 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $155.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M10-2B scores 1,644 and the Quadro K3000M reaches 1,618 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro K3000M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2B) vs 576 (Quadro K3000M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.7534 TFLOPS (Quadro K3000M).

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro K3000M
G3D Mark Score	1,644+2%	1,618
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+256%	576
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+540%	0.7534 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	768 KB+1500%	48 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro K3000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M10-2B has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K3000M carries 2 GB. Quadro K3000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M10-2B and 64-bit on the Quadro K3000M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K3000M) — the GRID M10-2B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro K3000M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M10-2B draws 225W versus the Quadro K3000M's 75W — a 100% difference. The Quadro K3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2B) vs 350W (Quadro K3000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro K3000M
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	7.3	21.6+196%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID M10-2B (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	GRID M10-2B	Quadro K3000M
MSRP	$2500	—
Codename	GM204	GK104
Release	August 30 2015	June 1 2012
Ranking	#433	#748

Search GRID M10-2B on Amazon

Search Quadro K3000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.