Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs Radeon R9 M275X
Intel UHD Graphics P750
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M275X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P750
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The Intel UHD Graphics P750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M275X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M275X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $300 for the Radeon R9 M275X, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 207% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+207%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics P750 and Radeon R9 M275X
Intel UHD Graphics P750
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,669 points.
Radeon R9 M275X
The Radeon R9 M275X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,631 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 scores 1,669 and the Radeon R9 M275X reaches 1,631 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is built on Generation 12.1 while the Radeon R9 M275X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics P750) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X). Raw compute: 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P750) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,669+2% | 1,631 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 640+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6656 TFLOPS | 1.184 TFLOPS+78% |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz+41% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X has 512 MB. The Radeon R9 M275X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics P750) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics P750) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | UVD 4.2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M275X's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P750) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 111.3+413% | 21.7 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon R9 M275X launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 costs 66.7% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.7 (Intel UHD Graphics P750) vs 5.4 (Radeon R9 M275X) — the Intel UHD Graphics P750 offers 209.3% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-50% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-67% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.7+209% | 5.4 |
| Codename | Rocket Lake GT1 | Venus |
| Release | 2021 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #717 | #746 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics P750 and Radeon R9 M275X
