Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Iris Graphics 550
Popular choices:
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Graphics 550.
| Insight | Iris Graphics 550 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Graphics 550 and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Iris Graphics 550
The Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Graphics 550 scores 3,311 and the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 reaches 3,331 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 550 is built on Generation 9.0 while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 550) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 550) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,331 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+28% | 0.6013 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 6 | 16+167% |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Graphics 550 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Graphics 550) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Iris Graphics 550) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,JPEG (Iris Graphics 550) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,JPEG | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Graphics 550 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2's 106W — a 150.4% difference. The Iris Graphics 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 550) vs 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-86% | 106W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 400W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 210mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 68°C |
| Perf/Watt | 220.7+603% | 31.4 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Graphics 550 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 launched at $129 and now averages $30. The Iris Graphics 550 costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Graphics 550) vs 111.0 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) — the Iris Graphics 550 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Graphics 550 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 111.0 |
| Codename | Skylake GT3e | GF116 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | March 15 2011 |
| Ranking | #775 | #739 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Graphics 550 and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
