Iris Graphics 550
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Iris Graphics 550 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Graphics 550 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Iris Graphics 550 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Graphics 550
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Graphics 550 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Graphics 550 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Iris Graphics 550
The Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Graphics 550 scores 3,311 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 550 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 14 nm+ vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 550) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,390+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+300% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Graphics 550 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 carries 2 GB. Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Graphics 550 and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Graphics 550) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Iris Graphics 550) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,JPEG (Iris Graphics 550) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video | QuickSync |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,JPEG | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Graphics 550 draws 15W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Graphics 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 550) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-50% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 220.7+95% | 113.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Graphics 550 came in at $0, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. On MSRP, Iris Graphics 550 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Graphics 550) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Iris Graphics 550 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 33.9 |
| Codename | Skylake GT3e | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | September 1 2015 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #775 | #508 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Graphics 550 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
