
Iris Graphics 550

Radeon E8870PCIe
Iris Graphics 550 vs Radeon E8870PCIe Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Graphics 550 vs Radeon E8870PCIe FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Graphics 550 vs Radeon E8870PCIe: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Graphics 550
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 37W, a 22W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Radeon E8870PCIe
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Graphics 550 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon E8870PCIe is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌146.7% higher power demand at 37W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Graphics 550 vs Radeon E8870PCIe Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Graphics 550
The Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Radeon E8870PCIe
The Radeon E8870PCIe is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,368 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Graphics 550 scores 3,311 and the Radeon E8870PCIe reaches 3,368 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 550 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon E8870PCIe uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 550) vs 640 (Radeon E8870PCIe). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 550) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8870PCIe). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 625 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,368+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 0.8 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+60% | 625 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | 16+167% |
| TMUs | 48+20% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Graphics 550 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon E8870PCIe carries 2 GB. Radeon E8870PCIe gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Graphics 550 and 64-bit on the Radeon E8870PCIe.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Graphics 550 draws 15W versus the Radeon E8870PCIe's 37W — a 84.6% difference. The Iris Graphics 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 550) vs 350W (Radeon E8870PCIe). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-59% | 37W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 220.7+143% | 91.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Graphics 550 came in at $0, while the Radeon E8870PCIe launched at $250. On MSRP, Iris Graphics 550 was 100+% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Graphics 550) vs 13.5 (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the Iris Graphics 550 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Graphics 550 (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 550 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 13.5 |
| Codename | Skylake GT3e | Venus |
| Release | September 1 2015 | January 25 2014 |
| Ranking | #775 | #734 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















