Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon 540

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 645

2019Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 540

2017Core: 1183 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon 540 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon 540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Plus Graphics 645

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon 540

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 540 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 540 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,452 vs 1,450), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 540 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 540 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon 540 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 645

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,450 points.

AMD

Radeon 540

The Radeon 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 scores 1,450 and the Radeon 540 reaches 1,452 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon 540 uses GCN 4.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 384 (Radeon 540). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon 540). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon 540
G3D Mark Score
1,450
1,452
Architecture
Generation 9.5
GCN 4.0
Process Node
14 nm+++
14 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8064 TFLOPS
0.9085 TFLOPS+13%
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1124 MHz+7%
ROPs
6
16+167%
TMUs
48+100%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon 540
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 540 carries 512 MB. Radeon 540 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 645 and 64-bit on the Radeon 540.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon 540
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 draws 15W versus the Radeon 540's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 350W (Radeon 540). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon 540
TDP
15W-70%
50W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Perf/Watt
96.7+233%
29.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics 645 came in at $0, while the Radeon 540 launched at $99. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 645 was 100+% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 14.7 (Radeon 540) — the Iris Plus Graphics 645 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 645 (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon 540
MSRP
$0-100%
$99
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
14.7
Codename
Coffee Lake GT3e
Lexa
Release
October 7 2019
April 20 2017
Ranking
#720
#773

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.