Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon RX Vega 6

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 645

2019Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 6

2017Core: 1247 MHzBoost: 1546 MHz

Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon RX Vega 6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Plus Graphics 645

2019

Why buy it

  • Radeon RX Vega 6 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Iris Plus Graphics 645 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 15W instead of 295W, a 280W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon RX Vega 6

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1866.7% higher power demand at 295W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega 6 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (1,492 vs 1,450), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX Vega 6 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon RX Vega 6 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Iris Plus Graphics 645 has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 645

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,450 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 6

The Radeon RX Vega 6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,492 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 scores 1,450 and the Radeon RX Vega 6 reaches 1,492 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon RX Vega 6 uses GCN 5.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 6). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 6). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1546 MHz.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon RX Vega 6
G3D Mark Score
1,450
1,492+3%
Architecture
Generation 9.5
GCN 5.0
Process Node
14 nm+++
14 nm
Shading Units
384
4096+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8064 TFLOPS
12.66 TFLOPS+1470%
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1546 MHz+47%
ROPs
6
64+967%
TMUs
48
256+433%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon RX Vega 6
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 645 and System on the Radeon RX Vega 6.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon RX Vega 6
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 draws 15W versus the Radeon RX Vega 6's 295W — a 180.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 6). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon RX Vega 6
TDP
15W-95%
295W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Perf/Watt
96.7+1796%
5.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics 645 came in at $0, while the Radeon RX Vega 6 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 6) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 645 (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon RX Vega 6
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Coffee Lake GT3e
Vega 10
Release
October 7 2019
August 7 2017
Ranking
#720
#171

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.