Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R7 M370

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 645

2019Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M370

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 960 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R7 M370 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R7 M370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Plus Graphics 645

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $130 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M370

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 M370 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (1,450 vs 1,418), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 M370 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M370 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Iris Plus Graphics 645 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R7 M370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 645

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,450 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M370

The Radeon R7 M370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 960 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,418 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 scores 1,450 and the Radeon R7 M370 reaches 1,418 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R7 M370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M370). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 0.7373 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M370). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 960 MHz.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon R7 M370
G3D Mark Score
1,450+2%
1,418
Architecture
Generation 9.5
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm+++
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8064 TFLOPS+9%
0.7373 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1050 MHz+9%
960 MHz
ROPs
6
8+33%
TMUs
48+100%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon R7 M370
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M370 carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 M370 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 645 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M370.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon R7 M370
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 M370's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M370). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon R7 M370
TDP
15W-80%
75W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
Mobile
Perf/Watt
96.7+412%
18.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics 645 came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 M370 launched at $130. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 645 was 100+% cheaper ($130 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 10.9 (Radeon R7 M370) — the Iris Plus Graphics 645 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 645 (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 645Radeon R7 M370
MSRP
$0-100%
$130
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
10.9
Codename
Coffee Lake GT3e
Litho
Release
October 7 2019
May 5 2015
Ranking
#720
#778

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.