Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Tesla M2090
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Popular choices:
Tesla M2090
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2090
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Iris Plus Graphics 645 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M2090 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Tesla M2090 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) |
| Longevity | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (248mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 645 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Tesla M2090
Iris Plus Graphics 645
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,450 points.
Tesla M2090
The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 scores 1,450 and the Tesla M2090 reaches 1,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,450+4% | 1,400 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8064 TFLOPS | 1.332 TFLOPS+65% |
| ROPs | 6 | 48+700% |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2090 has 512 MB. The Tesla M2090 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 draws 15W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 177.4% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-94% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 248mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 96.7+1627% | 5.6 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Tesla M2090 launched at $2500 and now averages $40. The Iris Plus Graphics 645 costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 645) vs 35.0 (Tesla M2090) — the Iris Plus Graphics 645 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | Tesla M2090 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 35.0 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT3e | GF110 |
| Release | October 7 2019 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #720 | #530 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Tesla M2090
