CPU
GPU
L40
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar L40
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The L40 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The L40 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The L40 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 223.9% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (48 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Insight | L40 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+223.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-223.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $8,174 for the L40, it costs 99% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 4105.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | L40 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4105.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,174) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L40 and GeForce GTX 1060
L40
The L40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 2490 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,601 points.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the L40 scores 32,601 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the L40 leads by 223.9%. The L40 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 4 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 90.52 TFLOPS (L40) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 2490 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | L40 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 32,601+224% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+610% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 90.52 TFLOPS+920% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2490 MHz+44% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+200% | 64 |
| TMUs | 568+255% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+1794% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | L40 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The L40 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (L40) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 400% advantage for the L40. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (L40) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the L40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+700% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s+400% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+4700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (L40) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | L40 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The L40 draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (L40) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | L40 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 180W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 400W-47% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 108.7+94% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The L40 launched at $31000 MSRP and currently averages $8174, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 99.3% less ($8114 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.0 (L40) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 4092.5% better value. The L40 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | L40 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $31000 | $249-99% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8174 | $60-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.0 | 167.7+4092% |
| Codename | AD102 | GP104 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #61 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on L40 and GeForce GTX 1060
