CPU
GPU
L40
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 5080
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar L40
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5080
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5080 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the L40 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | L40 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-10.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+10.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,250 versus $8,174 for the L40, it costs 85% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 620.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | L40 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+620.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,174) | ✅More affordable ($1,250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L40 and GeForce RTX 5080
L40
The L40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 2490 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,601 points.
GeForce RTX 5080
The GeForce RTX 5080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2295 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 360W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35,924 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the L40 scores 32,601 versus the GeForce RTX 5080's 35,924 — the GeForce RTX 5080 leads by 10.2%. The L40 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 5080 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (L40) vs 10,752 (GeForce RTX 5080). Raw compute: 90.52 TFLOPS (L40) vs 56.28 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5080). Boost clocks: 2490 MHz vs 2617 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (L40) vs 84 (GeForce RTX 5080) with 568 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | L40 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 32,601 | 35,924+10% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+69% | 10752 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 90.52 TFLOPS+61% | 56.28 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2490 MHz | 2617 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 192+71% | 112 |
| TMUs | 568+69% | 336 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+70% | 10.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+50% | 64 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+69% | 84 |
| Tensor Cores | 568+69% | 336 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | L40 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The L40 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5080 has 16 GB. The L40 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (L40) vs 1024 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5080) — a 6.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5080. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (L40) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 5080) — the L40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L40 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+200% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+7% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+50% | 64 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L40) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5080). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | L40 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (L40) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 5080). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (L40) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5080).
| Feature | L40 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The L40 draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 5080's 360W — a 18.2% difference. The L40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (L40) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 5080). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | L40 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W-17% | 360W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W-12% | 850W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.7+9% | 99.8 |
Value Analysis
The L40 launched at $31000 MSRP and currently averages $8174, while the GeForce RTX 5080 launched at $999 and now averages $1250. The GeForce RTX 5080 costs 84.7% less ($6924 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.0 (L40) vs 28.7 (GeForce RTX 5080) — the GeForce RTX 5080 offers 617.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 5080 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | L40 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $31000 | $999-97% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $8174 | $1250-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.0 | 28.7+618% |
| Codename | AD102 | GB203 |
| Release | October 13 2022 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #61 | #5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on L40 and GeForce RTX 5080
