
M1 8-Core GPU vs GeForce GTX 1630

M1 8-Core GPU
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The M1 8-Core GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1630 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | M1 8-Core GPU | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | Legacy (5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the M1 8-Core GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M1 8-Core GPU and GeForce GTX 1630
M1 8-Core GPU
The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The M1 8-Core GPU scores 5,000 and the GeForce GTX 1630 reaches 4,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 8 (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 1630).
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000 | 4,992 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 512+6300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The M1 8-Core GPU comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1630 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1630 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 68 GB/s (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 96 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1630) — a 41.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1630. Bus width: Unified vs 64-bit.
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 96 GB/s+41% |
| Bus Width | Unified | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: N/A (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 1630). OpenGL: 4.1 (Rosetta 2) vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | N/A | 12 Ultimate |
| OpenGL | 4.1 (Rosetta 2) | 4.6+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Apple M1 Video Encoder (M1 8-Core GPU) vs NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1630). Decoder: Apple M1 Video Decoder vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW (M1 8-Core GPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1630).
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Apple M1 Video Encoder | NVENC 6th gen |
| Decoder | Apple M1 Video Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The M1 8-Core GPU draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 1630's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1630). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 166.7+150% | 66.6 |
Value Analysis
The M1 8-Core GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150 and now averages $90. The M1 8-Core GPU costs 100+% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 55.5 (GeForce GTX 1630) — the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce GTX 1630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $90 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 55.5 |
| Codename | — | TU117 |
| Release | November 10 2020 | June 28 2022 |
| Ranking | #428 | #444 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















