M1 8-Core GPU vs Radeon R9 M395X
M1 8-Core GPU
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M395X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M395X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The M1 8-Core GPU uses modern memory architecture. The M1 8-Core GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M395X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M395X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the M1 8-Core GPU.
| Insight | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | Legacy (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 M395X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M1 8-Core GPU and Radeon R9 M395X
M1 8-Core GPU
The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Radeon R9 M395X
The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.
Graphics Performance
The M1 8-Core GPU scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 8 (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X).
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000 | 5,120+2% |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 2048+25500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The M1 8-Core GPU comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M395X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 68 GB/s (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 160 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395X) — a 135.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 M395X. Bus width: Unified vs 256-bit.
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 160 GB/s+135% |
| Bus Width | Unified | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The M1 8-Core GPU draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 166.7+144% | 68.3 |
Value Analysis
The M1 8-Core GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600 and now averages $150. The M1 8-Core GPU costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) vs 34.1 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The M1 8-Core GPU is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | M1 8-Core GPU | Radeon R9 M395X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 34.1 |
| Codename | — | Amethyst |
| Release | November 10 2020 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #428 | #438 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on M1 8-Core GPU and Radeon R9 M395X
