
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Popular choices:

M1 8-Core GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
2018Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- βPoor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- β150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- β More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
- β More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
2018M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- β More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
- β More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βPoor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- β150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1050 3GB better than M1 8-Core GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does M1 8-Core GPU make more sense than GeForce GTX 1050 3GB?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 40 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and M1 8-Core GPU

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.
M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB scores 5,116 and the M1 8-Core GPU reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 8 (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,116+2% | 5,000 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+9500% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The M1 8-Core GPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the M1 8-Core GPU has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 84 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 68 GB/s (M1 8-Core GPU) β a 23.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. Bus width: 96-bit vs Unified.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 84 GB/s+24% | 68 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | Unified |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs N/A (M1 8-Core GPU). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1 (Rosetta 2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 (Rosetta 2) |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs Apple M1 Video Encoder (M1 8-Core GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 3.0 vs Apple M1 Video Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | Apple M1 Video Encoder |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3.0 | Apple M1 Video Decoder |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB draws 75W versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 30W β a 85.7% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 350W (M1 8-Core GPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 68.2 | 166.7+144% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB launched at $129 MSRP, while the M1 8-Core GPU launched at $0. The M1 8-Core GPU costs 100+% less ($129 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) β the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The M1 8-Core GPU is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP107 | β |
| Release | May 21 2018 | November 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #440 | #428 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













