GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Radeon R9 M295X
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs Radeon R9 M295X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs Radeon R9 M295X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs Radeon R9 M295X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 131% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon R9 M295X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M295X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅50.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌132.6% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs Radeon R9 M295X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.
Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB scores 5,116 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 2.332 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,116 | 5,150 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.332 TFLOPS | 2.961 TFLOPS+27% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 512 KB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M295X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M295X gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 84 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 109.5% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 84 GB/s | 176 GB/s+110% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: NVDEC 3.0 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 145mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 68.2+231% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB came in at $129, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 3GB was 57% cheaper ($171 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers 130.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 3GB (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-57% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7+131% | 17.2 |
| Codename | GP107 | Amethyst |
| Release | May 21 2018 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #440 | #437 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and Radeon R9 M295X
