
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs FirePro W7100

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Popular choices:

FirePro W7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W7100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W7100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $114 for the FirePro W7100, it costs 47% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 91.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+91.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($114) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and FirePro W7100

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.

FirePro W7100
The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB scores 5,116 and the FirePro W7100 reaches 5,065 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is built on Pascal while the FirePro W7100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 1,792 (FirePro W7100). Raw compute: 2.332 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,116+1% | 5,065 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1792+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.332 TFLOPS | 3.297 TFLOPS+41% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 448 KB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W7100 has 8 GB. The FirePro W7100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 512 KB (FirePro W7100) — the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 8 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100). Decoder: NVDEC 3.0 vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3.0 | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB draws 75W versus the FirePro W7100's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 350W (FirePro W7100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 95.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 65-32% | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 68.2+102% | 33.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the FirePro W7100 launched at $799 and now averages $114. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB costs 47.4% less ($54 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 85.3 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 44.4 (FirePro W7100) — the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers 92.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-84% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-47% | $114 |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.3+92% | 44.4 |
| Codename | GP107 | Tonga |
| Release | May 21 2018 | August 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #440 | #406 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















