
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

GRID M60-2Q
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs GRID M60-2Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs GRID M60-2Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs GRID M60-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
2018Why buy it
- β Costs $2,871 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- β Delivers 2186.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- β GRID M60-2Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the less risky modern option long term.
- β Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2018 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GRID M60-2Q
2015Why buy it
- β 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- β2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β2225.6% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- β200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs GRID M60-2Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.

GRID M60-2Q
The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB scores 5,116 and the GRID M60-2Q reaches 5,203 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is built on Pascal while the GRID M60-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q). Raw compute: 2.332 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q). Boost clocks: 1518 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,116 | 5,203+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.332 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+107% |
| Boost Clock | 1518 MHz+29% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | 64+167% |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 768 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M60-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB has 3 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-2Q carries 4 GB. GRID M60-2Q gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and 128-bit on the GRID M60-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-2Q) β the GRID M60-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB draws 75W versus the GRID M60-2Q's 225W β a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 350W (GRID M60-2Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 68.2+195% | 23.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB came in at $129, while the GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 3GB was 95.7% cheaper ($2871 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 1.7 (GRID M60-2Q) β the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers 2235.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 3GB (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-96% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7+2235% | 1.7 |
| Codename | GP107 | GM204 |
| Release | May 21 2018 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #440 | #433 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















