GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Radeon Pro Vega 20
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs Radeon Pro Vega 20 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs Radeon Pro Vega 20 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs Radeon Pro Vega 20: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro Vega 20 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 20 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2018 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon Pro Vega 20
2018Why buy it
- ✅34.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs Radeon Pro Vega 20 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.
Radeon Pro Vega 20
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB scores 5,116 and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 reaches 5,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Raw compute: 2.332 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Boost clocks: 1518 MHz vs 1283 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,116 | 5,169+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1280+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.332 TFLOPS | 3.284 TFLOPS+41% |
| Boost Clock | 1518 MHz+18% | 1283 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 320 KB+11% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1050 3GB gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 20. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Decoder: NVDEC 3.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon Pro Vega 20).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 145mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65-19% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 68.2+32% | 51.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB came in at $129, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 20 was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP107 | Vega 12 |
| Release | May 21 2018 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #440 | #435 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and Radeon Pro Vega 20
