G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

✅51.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
93% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.3 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 86.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 21.3 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
✅GeForce GTX 760 Ti is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2018 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 51.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (5,307 vs 5,116), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $120 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 86.1% (39.7 vs 21.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 760 Ti still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB reaches 5,116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2.332 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1518 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
G3D Mark Score	5,307+4%	5,116
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2880+275%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.345 TFLOPS+129%	2.332 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	928 MHz	1518 MHz+64%
ROPs	48+100%	24
TMUs	240+400%	48
L1 Cache	240 KB	288 KB+20%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+100%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB carries 3 GB. GeForce GTX 1050 3GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 84 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — a 128.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti and 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	3 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s+129%	84 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+167%	96-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+100%	0.75 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
DirectX	11_0	12 (12_1)+9%
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 3.0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Encoder	NVENC 3rd Gen	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	NVDEC 3.0
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	None
Length	241mm	145mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	65
Perf/Watt	21.2	68.2+222%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti came in at $249, while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 3GB was 48.2% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 39.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers 86.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 3GB (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
MSRP	$249	$129-48%
Performance per Dollar	21.3	39.7+86%
Codename	GK110B	GP107
Release	November 7 2013	May 21 2018
Ranking	#278	#440

Search GeForce GTX 760 Ti on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1050 3GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.