GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Quadro P2000 (móvel)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1291 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Quadro P2000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 99.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.3 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P2000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

  • 2.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • GeForce GTX 760 Ti is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 100.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 21.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (5,353 vs 5,307), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $251 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 99.1% (21.3 vs 10.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P2000 (móvel) has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the Quadro P2000 (móvel) reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1291 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiQuadro P2000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
5,307
5,353
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2880+150%
1152
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.345 TFLOPS+80%
2.974 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1291 MHz+39%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
240+233%
72
L1 Cache
240 KB
432 KB+80%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+20%
1.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiQuadro P2000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) carries 4 GB. Quadro P2000 (móvel) gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti and 128-bit on the Quadro P2000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiQuadro P2000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+20%
1.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiQuadro P2000 (móvel)
TDP
250W
75W-70%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
21.2
71.4+237%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti came in at $249, while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 760 Ti was 50.2% cheaper ($251 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 10.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti offers 99.1% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P2000 (móvel) (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiQuadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP
$249-50%
$500
Performance per Dollar
21.3+99%
10.7
Codename
GK110B
GP106
Release
November 7 2013
February 15 2019
Ranking
#278
#399

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.