G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

✅37.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

2018

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅GeForce GTX 760 Ti is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 37.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design instead at 5,310 vs 5,307, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 760 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 5,310 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1417 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	5,307	5,310
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2880+275%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.345 TFLOPS+146%	2.177 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	928 MHz	1417 MHz+53%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	240+400%	48
L1 Cache	240 KB	288 KB+20%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s+71%	112 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
DirectX	11_0	12 (12_1)+9%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC (3rd Gen).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Encoder	NVENC 3rd Gen	NVENC (6th Gen)
Decoder	NVDEC 1st Gen	NVDEC (3rd Gen)
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	21.2	70.8+234%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
MSRP	$249	—
Codename	GK110B	GP107
Release	November 7 2013	January 3 2018
Ranking	#278	#429

Search GeForce GTX 760 Ti on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.