GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

2017Core: 1215 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

  • 25.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 212.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 80W.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

2017

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 80W instead of 250W, a 170W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 25.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P2000 Max-Q instead at 5,353 vs 5,307, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiQuadro P2000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
5,307
5,353
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2880+275%
768
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1468 MHz+58%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiQuadro P2000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q carries 4 GB. Quadro P2000 Max-Q gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti and 128-bit on the Quadro P2000 Max-Q.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiQuadro P2000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 80W — a 103% difference. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiQuadro P2000 Max-Q
TDP
250W
80W-68%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
21.2
66.9+216%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P2000 Max-Q (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiQuadro P2000 Max-Q
MSRP
$249
Codename
GK110B
GP107GL
Release
November 7 2013
July 5 2017
Ranking
#278
#426

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.