GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon RX 6300

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6300

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
RX family
·······

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon RX 6300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon RX 6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

  • 19.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 315% HIGHER MSRP
    $249 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.3 vs 88.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Radeon RX 6300

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $189 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Delivers 315.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 21.3 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 6300 instead at 5,319 vs 5,307, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while GeForce GTX 760 Ti is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, and 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $189 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 315.9% (88.7 vs 21.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 760 Ti still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the Radeon RX 6300 reaches 5,319 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiRadeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score
5,307
5,319
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
2880+275%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.345 TFLOPS+45%
3.686 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
928 MHz
2400 MHz+159%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
240+400%
48
L1 Cache
240 KB
256 KB+7%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 760 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiRadeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 6300 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiRadeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s+200%
64 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+700%
32-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiRadeon RX 6300
DirectX
11_0
12_2+9%
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs VCN 3.0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiRadeon RX 6300
Encoder
NVENC 3rd Gen
VCN 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
VCN 3.0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 150.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiRadeon RX 6300
TDP
250W
35W-86%
Recommended PSU
500W
300W-40%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
160mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Perf/Watt
21.2
152.0+617%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti came in at $249, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6300 was 75.9% cheaper ($189 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 316.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300 (2022 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiRadeon RX 6300
MSRP
$249
$60-76%
Performance per Dollar
21.3
88.7+316%
Codename
GK110B
Navi 24
Release
November 7 2013
January 4 2022
Ranking
#278
#379

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.