G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 210W instead of 250W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
16.1% HIGHER MSRP
$289 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 21.3 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

✅17.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 18.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.3 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌19% higher power demand at 250W vs 210W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (5,307 vs 5,200), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 760 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $289, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 18.5% (21.3 vs 18.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti reaches 5,307 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
G3D Mark Score	5,200	5,307+2%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448	2880+543%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.312 TFLOPS	5.345 TFLOPS+307%
ROPs	40	48+20%
TMUs	56	240+329%
L1 Cache	896 KB+273%	240 KB
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1.5 MB+138%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — a 23.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	156 GB/s	192 GB/s+23%
Bus Width	320-bit+25%	256-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1.5 MB+138%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)+9%	11_0
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Encoder	UVD 4.0	NVENC 3rd Gen
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti's 250W — a 17.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
TDP	210W-16%	250W
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	2x 6-pin
Length	267mm	241mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	76°C	—
Perf/Watt	24.8+17%	21.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti launched at $249. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 760 Ti was 13.8% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti offers 18.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 760 Ti (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
MSRP	$289	$249-14%
Performance per Dollar	18.0	21.3+18%
Codename	GF110	GK110B
Release	November 29 2011	November 7 2013
Ranking	#571	#278

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 760 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.