GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
VS
GeForce GTX 760 Ti

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011Core: 732 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
210
5,200
0.0%
brand logoGeForce MX350
brand logoGeForce GTX 960A
brand logoGeForce GTX 660
brand logoGeForce MX550
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI (móvel)
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 760 Ti
250
5,307
+2.1%
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 870M
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 580
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoTitan X Pascal
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI (móvel)
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $249), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 713.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Cost Efficiency
✅Better overall value (+713.3%)
❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
✅More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($249)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 760 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low95 FPS
medium56 FPS
high39 FPS
ultra21 FPS
1440p
low61 FPS
medium35 FPS
high24 FPS
ultra14 FPS
4K
low18 FPS
medium13 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra6 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low149 FPS
medium114 FPS
high90 FPS
ultra70 FPS
1440p
low96 FPS
medium66 FPS
high54 FPS
ultra40 FPS
4K
low43 FPS
medium34 FPS
high28 FPS
ultra19 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low127 FPS
medium94 FPS
high72 FPS
ultra51 FPS
1440p
low77 FPS
medium60 FPS
high39 FPS
ultra26 FPS
4K
low32 FPS
medium24 FPS
high17 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low188 FPS
medium159 FPS
high128 FPS
ultra78 FPS
1440p
low126 FPS
medium113 FPS
high85 FPS
ultra58 FPS
4K
low65 FPS
medium56 FPS
high46 FPS
ultra35 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low234 FPS
medium187 FPS
high156 FPS
ultra117 FPS
1440p
low176 FPS
medium140 FPS
high117 FPS
ultra88 FPS
4K
low84 FPS
medium74 FPS
high68 FPS
ultra44 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low239 FPS
medium191 FPS
high159 FPS
ultra119 FPS
1440p
low179 FPS
medium143 FPS
high119 FPS
ultra90 FPS
4K
low119 FPS
medium96 FPS
high80 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low168 FPS
medium137 FPS
high111 FPS
ultra68 FPS
1440p
low97 FPS
medium84 FPS
high64 FPS
ultra38 FPS
4K
low42 FPS
medium34 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low126 FPS
medium110 FPS
high88 FPS
ultra58 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS
medium68 FPS
high51 FPS
ultra35 FPS
4K
low47 FPS
medium39 FPS
high23 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and GeForce GTX 760 Ti

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti reaches 5,307 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce GTX 760 Ti
G3D Mark Score
5,200
5,307+2%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
448
2880+543%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.312 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS+307%
ROPs
40
48+20%
TMUs
56
240+329%
L1 Cache
896 KB+273%
240 KB
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
1.5 MB+138%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — a 23.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. Bus width: 320-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce GTX 760 Ti
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
156 GB/s
192 GB/s+23%
Bus Width
320-bit+25%
256-bit
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
1.5 MB+138%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce GTX 760 Ti
DirectX
12 (FL 11_0)+9%
11_0
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Encoder
UVD 4.0
NVENC 3rd Gen
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti's 250W — a 17.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce GTX 760 Ti
TDP
210W-16%
250W
Recommended PSU
550W
500W-9%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
2x 6-pin
Length
267mm
241mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
76°C
—
Perf/Watt
24.8+17%
21.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti launched at $249 and now averages $249. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 88% less ($219 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 713.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448GeForce GTX 760 Ti
MSRP
$289
$249-14%
Avg Price (30d)
$30-88%
$249
Performance per Dollar
173.3+714%
21.3
Codename
GF110
GK110B
Release
November 29 2011
November 7 2013
Ranking
#571
#278