G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

✅17.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌180% higher power demand at 210W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

2018

Why buy it

✅GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 210W, a 135W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design instead at 5,310 vs 5,200, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 5,310 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	5,200	5,310+2%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	448	768+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.312 TFLOPS	2.177 TFLOPS+66%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	56+17%	48
L1 Cache	896 KB+211%	288 KB
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) — a 39.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	156 GB/s+39%	112 GB/s
Bus Width	320-bit+150%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.2	4.6+10%
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Encoder	UVD 4.0	NVENC (6th Gen)
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	NVDEC (3rd Gen)
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design's 75W — a 94.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 76°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
TDP	210W	75W-64%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	76°C	70°C-8%
Perf/Watt	24.8	70.8+185%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design (2018 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
MSRP	$289	—
Codename	GF110	GP107
Release	November 29 2011	January 3 2018
Ranking	#571	#429

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.