GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GRID P4-8Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GRID P4-8Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GRID P4-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,711 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 581.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌110% higher power demand at 210W vs 100W.

GRID P4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 210W, a 110W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
592% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P4-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (5,283 vs 5,200), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,711 cheaper on MSRP at $289 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 581.2% (18.0 vs 2.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID P4-8Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GRID P4-8Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

GRID P4-8Q

The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the GRID P4-8Q reaches 5,283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GRID P4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GRID P4-8Q
G3D Mark Score	5,200	5,283+2%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448	1536+243%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.312 TFLOPS	2.218 TFLOPS+69%
ROPs	40	64+60%
TMUs	56	96+71%
L1 Cache	896 KB+56%	576 KB
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	2 MB+217%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P4-8Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GRID P4-8Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 128-bit on the GRID P4-8Q. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) — the GRID P4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GRID P4-8Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	320-bit+150%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	2 MB+217%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GRID P4-8Q's 100W — a 71% difference. The GRID P4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (GRID P4-8Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GRID P4-8Q
TDP	210W	100W-52%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	76°C	—
Perf/Watt	24.8	52.8+113%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the GRID P4-8Q launched at $2000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 was 85.5% cheaper ($1711 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2.6 (GRID P4-8Q) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 592.3% better value. The newer card here is GRID P4-8Q (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GRID P4-8Q
MSRP	$289-86%	$2000
Performance per Dollar	18.0+592%	2.6
Codename	GF110	GM204
Release	November 29 2011	August 30 2015
Ranking	#571	#535

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on Amazon

Search GRID P4-8Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.