
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GRID P4-8Q

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Popular choices:

GRID P4-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P4-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $200), it costs 85% less, resulting in a 556.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+556.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and GRID P4-8Q

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

GRID P4-8Q
The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the GRID P4-8Q reaches 5,283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GRID P4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,200 | 5,283+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 1536+243% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.312 TFLOPS | 2.218 TFLOPS+69% |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 56 | 96+71% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+56% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 2 MB+217% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 320-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) — the GRID P4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+150% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 2 MB+217% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GRID P4-8Q's 100W — a 71% difference. The GRID P4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (GRID P4-8Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W | 100W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 76°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.8 | 52.8+113% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GRID P4-8Q launched at $2000 and now averages $200. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 85% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 26.4 (GRID P4-8Q) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 556.4% better value. The GRID P4-8Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | GRID P4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-86% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-85% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 173.3+556% | 26.4 |
| Codename | GF110 | GM204 |
| Release | November 29 2011 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #571 | #535 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















