GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon HD 8990

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon HD 8990 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon HD 8990: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $710 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 244.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
✅Draws 210W instead of 375W, a 165W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8990 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8990

2013

Why buy it

✅18.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
245.7% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
❌78.6% higher power demand at 375W vs 210W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8990 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (5,214 vs 5,200), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $710 cheaper on MSRP at $289 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 244.7% (18.0 vs 5.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 8990 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon HD 8990 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

Radeon HD 8990

The Radeon HD 8990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,214 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the Radeon HD 8990 reaches 5,214 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8990 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 8990). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 8990).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Radeon HD 8990
G3D Mark Score	5,200	5,214
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448	2048 ×2+357%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.312 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS ×2+212%
ROPs	40+25%	32 ×2
TMUs	56	128 ×2+129%
L1 Cache	896 KB+75%	512 KB
L2 Cache	640 KB	768 KB+20%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8990 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Radeon HD 8990
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8990 carries 3 GB. GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 288 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8990) — a 1747.4% advantage for the Radeon HD 8990. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 384-bit x2 on the Radeon HD 8990. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 8990) — the Radeon HD 8990 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Radeon HD 8990
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+33%	3 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	156 GB/s	288 GB/s x2+85%
Bus Width	320-bit	384-bit x2+20%
L2 Cache	640 KB	768 KB+20%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the Radeon HD 8990's 375W — a 56.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 750W (Radeon HD 8990). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Radeon HD 8990
TDP	210W-44%	375W
Recommended PSU	550W-27%	750W
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	76°C	—
Perf/Watt	24.8+78%	13.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the Radeon HD 8990 launched at $999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 was 71.1% cheaper ($710 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 5.2 (Radeon HD 8990) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 246.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8990 (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Radeon HD 8990
MSRP	$289-71%	$999
Performance per Dollar	18.0+246%	5.2
Codename	GF110	Malta
Release	November 29 2011	April 24 2013
Ranking	#571	#412

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8990 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.