GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Radeon RX 6300
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon RX 6300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon RX 6300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
2011Why buy it
- ✅1.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌381.7% HIGHER MSRP$289 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 88.7 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌500% higher power demand at 210W vs 35W.
Radeon RX 6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 392.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 210W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.
Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the Radeon RX 6300 reaches 5,319 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,200 | 5,319+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 768+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.312 TFLOPS | 3.686 TFLOPS+181% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 56+17% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+250% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300) — a 143.8% advantage for the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 156 GB/s+144% | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+900% | 32-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs VCN 3.0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W | 35W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 300W-45% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 76°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.8 | 152.0+513% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6300 was 79.2% cheaper ($229 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 392.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300 (2022 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289 | $60-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0 | 88.7+393% |
| Codename | GF110 | Navi 24 |
| Release | November 29 2011 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #571 | #379 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Radeon RX 6300
