GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011Core: 732 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1291 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $211 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 68.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P2000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 180% higher power demand at 210W vs 75W.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

  • 20.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 210W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 73% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (5,353 vs 5,200), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $211 cheaper on MSRP at $289 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 68.1% (18.0 vs 10.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P2000 (móvel) has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the Quadro P2000 (móvel) reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448Quadro P2000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
5,200
5,353+3%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
40 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
448
1152+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.312 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS+127%
ROPs
40+25%
32
TMUs
56
72+29%
L1 Cache
896 KB+107%
432 KB
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
1.25 MB+98%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 128-bit on the Quadro P2000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P2000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448Quadro P2000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
320-bit+150%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
1.25 MB+98%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 94.7% difference. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448Quadro P2000 (móvel)
TDP
210W
75W-64%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
76°C
Perf/Watt
24.8
71.4+188%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 was 42.2% cheaper ($211 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 10.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 68.2% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P2000 (móvel) (2019 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP
$289-42%
$500
Performance per Dollar
18.0+68%
10.7
Codename
GF110
GP106
Release
November 29 2011
February 15 2019
Ranking
#571
#399

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.