CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Popular choices:
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Quadro P2000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $150 for the Quadro P2000 (móvel), it costs 80% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 385.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+385.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Quadro P2000 (móvel)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the Quadro P2000 (móvel) reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,200 | 5,353+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 1152+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.312 TFLOPS | 2.974 TFLOPS+127% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 72+29% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+107% | 432 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1.25 MB+98% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 320-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P2000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+150% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1.25 MB+98% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 94.7% difference. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W | 75W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 76°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.8 | 71.4+188% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 35.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 385.4% better value. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-42% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-80% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 173.3+385% | 35.7 |
| Codename | GF110 | GP106 |
| Release | November 29 2011 | February 15 2019 |
| Ranking | #571 | #399 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Quadro P2000 (móvel)
