G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

✅28.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
124% HIGHER MSRP
$289 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌180% higher power demand at 210W vs 75W.
❌84.1% longer card at 267mm vs 145mm.

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 120.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 210W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 267mm, a 122mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 28.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (5,200 vs 5,116), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $160 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $289, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 120.4% (39.7 vs 18.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB reaches 5,116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2.332 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
G3D Mark Score	5,200+2%	5,116
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	448	768+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.312 TFLOPS	2.332 TFLOPS+78%
ROPs	40+67%	24
TMUs	56+17%	48
L1 Cache	896 KB+211%	288 KB
L2 Cache	640 KB	768 KB+20%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB carries 3 GB. GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 84 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — a 85.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 768 KB (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+33%	3 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	156 GB/s+86%	84 GB/s
Bus Width	320-bit+233%	96-bit
L2 Cache	640 KB	768 KB+20%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.2	4.6+10%
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs NVDEC 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Encoder	UVD 4.0	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	NVDEC 3.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB's 75W — a 94.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 76°C vs 65.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
TDP	210W	75W-64%
Recommended PSU	550W	300W-45%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	None
Length	267mm	145mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	76°C	65-14%
Perf/Watt	24.8	68.2+175%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 3GB was 55.4% cheaper ($160 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 39.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers 120.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 3GB (2018 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
MSRP	$289	$129-55%
Performance per Dollar	18.0	39.7+121%
Codename	GF110	GP107
Release	November 29 2011	May 21 2018
Ranking	#571	#440

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1050 3GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.