G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 950 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

✅21.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
81.8% HIGHER MSRP
$289 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 210W vs 90W.
❌32.2% longer card at 267mm vs 202mm.

GeForce GTX 950

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 87.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Draws 90W instead of 210W, a 120W reduction.
✅Measures 202mm instead of 267mm, a 65mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 950 instead at 5,357 vs 5,200, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 950 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $130 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $289, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 87.2% (33.7 vs 18.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 950 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GeForce GTX 950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce GTX 950

The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the GeForce GTX 950 reaches 5,357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 950 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 950). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 950
G3D Mark Score	5,200	5,357+3%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448	768+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.312 TFLOPS	1.825 TFLOPS+39%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	56+17%	48
L1 Cache	896 KB+211%	288 KB
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 950
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) — a 47.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) — the GeForce GTX 950 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 950
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	156 GB/s+47%	106 GB/s
Bus Width	320-bit+150%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 950
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12_1
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 950
Encoder	UVD 4.0	NVENC 2nd Gen
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GeForce GTX 950's 90W — a 80% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 202mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 950
TDP	210W	90W-57%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	267mm	202mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	76°C	—
Perf/Watt	24.8	59.5+140%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 came in at $289, while the GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950 was 45% cheaper ($130 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 33.7 (GeForce GTX 950) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 87.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 950 (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GeForce GTX 950
MSRP	$289	$159-45%
Performance per Dollar	18.0	33.7+87%
Codename	GF110	GM206
Release	November 29 2011	August 20 2015
Ranking	#571	#425

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 950 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.