GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

✅6.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌162.5% higher power demand at 210W vs 80W.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 210W, a 130W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P2000 Max-Q instead at 5,353 vs 5,200, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	5,200	5,353+3%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	448	768+71%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 128-bit on the Quadro P2000 Max-Q.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	320-bit+150%	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 80W — a 89.7% difference. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
TDP	210W	80W-62%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	76°C	—
Perf/Watt	24.8	66.9+170%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P2000 Max-Q (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
MSRP	$289	—
Codename	GF110	GP107GL
Release	November 29 2011	July 5 2017
Ranking	#571	#426

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on Amazon

Search Quadro P2000 Max-Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.