GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Arc Graphics 140V
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2011). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | Xe² (2024) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 90% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 906.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+906.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Arc Graphics 140V
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the Arc Graphics 140V reaches 5,168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Arc Graphics 140V uses Xe², both on 40 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140V).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,200 | 5,168 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Xe² |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 448+5500% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 320-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 156 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 320-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12.2+2% |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 4.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the Arc Graphics 140V's 15W — a 173.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140V). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 76°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 76°C-11% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 24.8 | 344.5+1289% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 and now averages $300. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 90% less ($270 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 907.6% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-17% | $350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-90% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 173.3+908% | 17.2 |
| Codename | GF110 | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Release | November 29 2011 | September 24 2024 |
| Ranking | #571 | #434 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Arc Graphics 140V
