GeForce RTX 3070 vs Arc Graphics 140V
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 329% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+329%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-329%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Xe² (2024) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 33% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 543.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+543.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Arc Graphics 140V
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Arc Graphics 140V's 5,168 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 329%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Arc Graphics 140V uses Xe², both on 8 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140V). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+329% | 5,168 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe² |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+73500% | 8 |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2050 MHz+19% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc Graphics 140V relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Arc Graphics 140V's 15W — a 174.5% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140V). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 344.5+242% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 and now averages $300. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 33.3% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 544.8% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $350-30% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-33% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+545% | 17.2 |
| Codename | GA104 | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Release | September 1 2020 | September 24 2024 |
| Ranking | #63 | #434 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and Arc Graphics 140V
