GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs GRID M60-2Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-2Q

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

91%

#289

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

8539%

#304

NVS 310

MSRP: $159|Avg: $10

100%

#305

GRID M60-2Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

100%

#307

FirePro 3D V3750

MSRP: $199|Avg: $25

99%

#308

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

98%

#309

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

97%

#310

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

95%

#311

FirePro 3D V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30

94%

#312

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

92%

#313

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

91%

#314

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

91%

#316

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

89%

#317

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

88%

#318

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

88%

#319

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M60-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448.

Insight	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GRID M60-2Q
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $150), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 399.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GRID M60-2Q
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+399.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($30)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 Benchmark Check

GRID M60-2Q Benchmark Check

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and GRID M60-2Q

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

GRID M60-2Q

The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the GRID M60-2Q reaches 5,203 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GRID M60-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GRID M60-2Q
G3D Mark Score	5,200	5,203
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448	2048+357%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.312 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+268%
ROPs	40	64+60%
TMUs	56	128+129%
L1 Cache	896 KB+17%	768 KB
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	2 MB+217%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GRID M60-2Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 320-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-2Q) — the GRID M60-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GRID M60-2Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	320-bit+150%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	2 MB+217%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the GRID M60-2Q's 225W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (GRID M60-2Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	GRID M60-2Q
TDP	210W-7%	225W
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	76°C	—
Perf/Watt	24.8+7%	23.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 34.7 (GRID M60-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 399.4% better value. The GRID M60-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).