GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon Pro Vega 20
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2011). The Radeon Pro Vega 20 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega 20.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Radeon Pro Vega 20
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.
Radeon Pro Vega 20
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the Radeon Pro Vega 20 reaches 5,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 uses GCN 5.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,200 | 5,169 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 1280+186% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.312 TFLOPS | 3.284 TFLOPS+150% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+180% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 320-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+150% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon Pro Vega 20).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 4.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 20's 100W — a 71% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 76°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W | 100W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 76°C-5% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 24.8 | 51.7+108% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 launched at $289 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon Pro Vega 20 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 173.3 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 20) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | Radeon Pro Vega 20 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 173.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF110 | Vega 12 |
| Release | November 29 2011 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #571 | #435 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Radeon Pro Vega 20
