GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 950

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950

2015Core: 1024 MHzBoost: 1188 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 950 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 950 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

  • 43.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 56.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $249 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.3 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • 177.8% higher power demand at 250W vs 90W.
  • 19.3% longer card at 241mm vs 202mm.

GeForce GTX 950

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $90 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Delivers 58.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 21.3 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Draws 90W instead of 250W, a 160W reduction.
  • Measures 202mm instead of 241mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 43.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 950 instead at 5,357 vs 5,307, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 950 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $90 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 58.1% (33.7 vs 21.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 950 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 760 Ti has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GeForce GTX 950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950

The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the GeForce GTX 950 reaches 5,357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 950 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 950). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1188 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGeForce GTX 950
G3D Mark Score
5,307
5,357
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2880+275%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.345 TFLOPS+193%
1.825 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1188 MHz+28%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
240+400%
48
L1 Cache
240 KB
288 KB+20%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGeForce GTX 950
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) — a 81.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGeForce GTX 950
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s+81%
106 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGeForce GTX 950
DirectX
11_0
12_1+9%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGeForce GTX 950
Encoder
NVENC 3rd Gen
NVENC 2nd Gen
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 950's 90W — a 94.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 202mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGeForce GTX 950
TDP
250W
90W-64%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
241mm
202mm
Slots
2
2
Perf/Watt
21.2
59.5+181%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti came in at $249, while the GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950 was 36.1% cheaper ($90 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 33.7 (GeForce GTX 950) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 58.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 950 (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGeForce GTX 950
MSRP
$249
$159-36%
Performance per Dollar
21.3
33.7+58%
Codename
GK110B
GM206
Release
November 7 2013
August 20 2015
Ranking
#278
#425

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.