Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti

CPU

GPU

Arc A310

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz

Arc family

···

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti Performance Spectrum

Arc A310

4 GB 75

5,438

+2.5%

5,307

0.0%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A310

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 155.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 21.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

✅19.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
149% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.3 vs 54.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Arc A310 instead at 5,438 vs 5,307, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $149 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 155.1% (54.4 vs 21.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 760 Ti still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A310 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A310

The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A310 scores 5,438 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti reaches 5,307 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A310 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Arc A310) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 928 MHz.

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
G3D Mark Score	5,438+2%	5,307
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Kepler
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2880+275%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.072 TFLOPS	5.345 TFLOPS+74%
Boost Clock	2000 MHz+116%	928 MHz
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	32	240+650%
L1 Cache	1.1 MB+378%	0.23 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+167%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A310 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti carries 2 GB. Arc A310 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 124 GB/s (Arc A310) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — a 54.8% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Arc A310 and 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A310) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — the Arc A310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	124 GB/s	192 GB/s+55%
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	4 MB+167%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A310) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
DirectX	12 Ultimate+9%	11_0
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A310) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 1st Gen.

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	NVENC 3rd Gen
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A310 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A310) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 169mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	2x 6-pin
Length	169mm	241mm
Height	69mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	72.5+242%	21.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A310 came in at $100, while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti launched at $249. On MSRP, Arc A310 was 59.8% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 54.4 (Arc A310) vs 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — the Arc A310 offers 155.4% better value. The newer card here is Arc A310 (2022 vs 2013).

Feature	Arc A310	GeForce GTX 760 Ti
MSRP	$100-60%	$249
Performance per Dollar	54.4+155%	21.3
Codename	DG2-128	GK110B
Release	October 12 2022	November 7 2013
Ranking	#422	#278

Search Arc A310 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 760 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.