GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Tesla K80

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Tesla K80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Tesla K80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1887.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.3 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla K80

2014

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1908% HIGHER MSRP
$5,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 21.3 G3D/$ ($5,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla K80 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (5,363 vs 5,307), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 760 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,751 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $5,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1887.1% (21.3 vs 1.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla K80 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Tesla K80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

Tesla K80

The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the Tesla K80 reaches 5,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the Tesla K80 uses Kepler 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2,496 (Tesla K80). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 824 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Tesla K80
G3D Mark Score	5,307	5,363+1%
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2880+15%	2496 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.345 TFLOPS+30%	4.113 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	928 MHz+13%	824 MHz
ROPs	48	48 ×2
TMUs	240+15%	208 ×2
L1 Cache	240 KB+15%	208 KB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla K80 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Tesla K80
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K80 carries 4 GB. Tesla K80 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti and 128-bit on the Tesla K80.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Tesla K80
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	1.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the Tesla K80's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 350W (Tesla K80). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Tesla K80
TDP	250W-17%	300W
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	21.2+18%	17.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti came in at $249, while the Tesla K80 launched at $5000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 760 Ti was 95% cheaper ($4751 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1.1 (Tesla K80) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti offers 1836.4% better value. The newer card here is Tesla K80 (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Tesla K80
MSRP	$249-95%	$5000
Performance per Dollar	21.3+1836%	1.1
Codename	GK110B	GK210
Release	November 7 2013	November 17 2014
Ranking	#278	#419

Search GeForce GTX 760 Ti on Amazon

Search Tesla K80 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.