
GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs Tesla K80

GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Popular choices:

Tesla K80
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla K80 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla K80 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla K80 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $249), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 403.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+403.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($249) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti and Tesla K80

GeForce GTX 760 Ti
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

Tesla K80
The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the Tesla K80 reaches 5,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the Tesla K80 uses Kepler 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2,496 (Tesla K80). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 824 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,307 | 5,363+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+15% | 2496 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.345 TFLOPS+30% | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 928 MHz+13% | 824 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 ×2 |
| TMUs | 240+15% | 208 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB+15% | 208 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K80 has 4 GB. The Tesla K80 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the Tesla K80's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 350W (Tesla K80). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 21.2+18% | 17.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $249, while the Tesla K80 launched at $5000 and now averages $50. The Tesla K80 costs 79.9% less ($199 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 107.3 (Tesla K80) — the Tesla K80 offers 403.8% better value. The Tesla K80 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-95% | $5000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $249 | $50-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.3 | 107.3+404% |
| Codename | GK110B | GK210 |
| Release | November 7 2013 | November 17 2014 |
| Ranking | #278 | #419 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















