Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GRID P4-8Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID P4-8Q

2015Core: 722 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GRID P4-8Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 760 Ti
2 GB 250
5,307
+0.5%
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 870M
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 580
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoTitan X Pascal
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
GRID P4-8Q
4 GB 100
5,283
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 870M
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 580
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoTitan X Pascal
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GRID P4-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 706.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.3 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.

GRID P4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    703.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 21.3 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (5,307 vs 5,283), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,751 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 706.9% (21.3 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GRID P4-8Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GRID P4-8Q

The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the GRID P4-8Q reaches 5,283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the GRID P4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGRID P4-8Q
G3D Mark Score
5,307
5,283
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2880+88%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.345 TFLOPS+141%
2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
240+150%
96
L1 Cache
240 KB
576 KB+140%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P4-8Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGRID P4-8Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P4-8Q carries 4 GB. GRID P4-8Q gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti and 128-bit on the GRID P4-8Q. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) — the GRID P4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGRID P4-8Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the GRID P4-8Q's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The GRID P4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 350W (GRID P4-8Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGRID P4-8Q
TDP
250W
100W-60%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
—
Slots
2
—
Perf/Watt
21.2
52.8+149%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti came in at $249, while the GRID P4-8Q launched at $2000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 760 Ti was 87.5% cheaper ($1751 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2.6 (GRID P4-8Q) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti offers 719.2% better value. The newer card here is GRID P4-8Q (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGRID P4-8Q
MSRP
$249-88%
$2000
Performance per Dollar
21.3+719%
2.6
Codename
GK110B
GM204
Release
November 7 2013
August 30 2015
Ranking
#278
#535
Search GeForce GTX 760 Ti on AmazonSearch GRID P4-8Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.