GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GRID M60-2Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz
VS

GRID M60-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GRID M60-2Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GRID M60-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $2,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 1128.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.3 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M60-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • βœ…More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014βˆ’2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    1104.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 21.3 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (5,307 vs 5,203), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,751 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1128.9% (21.3 vs 1.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GRID M60-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-2Q

The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the GRID M60-2Q reaches 5,203 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the GRID M60-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGRID M60-2Q
G3D Mark Score
5,307+2%
5,203
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2880+41%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.345 TFLOPS+11%
4.825 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1178 MHz+27%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
240+88%
128
L1 Cache
240 KB
768 KB+220%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M60-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGRID M60-2Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-2Q carries 4 GB. GRID M60-2Q gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti and 128-bit on the GRID M60-2Q. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-2Q) β€” the GRID M60-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGRID M60-2Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the GRID M60-2Q's 225W β€” a 10.5% difference. The GRID M60-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 350W (GRID M60-2Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGRID M60-2Q
TDP
250W
225W-10%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
β€”
Slots
2
β€”
Perf/Watt
21.2
23.1+9%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti came in at $249, while the GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 760 Ti was 91.7% cheaper ($2751 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 1.7 (GRID M60-2Q) β€” the GeForce GTX 760 Ti offers 1152.9% better value. The newer card here is GRID M60-2Q (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 TiGRID M60-2Q
MSRP
$249-92%
$3000
Performance per Dollar
21.3+1153%
1.7
Codename
GK110B
GM204
Release
November 7 2013
August 30 2015
Ranking
#278
#433

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.