
GeForce GTX 760 Ti vs GRID M60-2Q

GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Popular choices:

GRID M60-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID M60-2Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID M60-2Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M60-2Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $249), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 62.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+62.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($249) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti and GRID M60-2Q

GeForce GTX 760 Ti
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.

GRID M60-2Q
The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti scores 5,307 and the GRID M60-2Q reaches 5,203 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is built on Kepler while the GRID M60-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,307+2% | 5,203 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+41% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.345 TFLOPS+11% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 928 MHz | 1178 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 768 KB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-2Q has 4 GB. The GRID M60-2Q offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-2Q) — the GRID M60-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti draws 250W versus the GRID M60-2Q's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID M60-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 350W (GRID M60-2Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 225W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 21.2 | 23.1+9% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $249, while the GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The GRID M60-2Q costs 39.8% less ($99 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.3 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) vs 34.7 (GRID M60-2Q) — the GRID M60-2Q offers 62.9% better value. The GRID M60-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-92% | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $249 | $150-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.3 | 34.7+63% |
| Codename | GK110B | GM204 |
| Release | November 7 2013 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #278 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















