
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 126% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 275mm, a 130mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2018 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅50.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌131.8% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
- ❌89.7% longer card at 275mm vs 145mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB vs Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,248 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB scores 5,116 and the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X reaches 5,248 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Raw compute: 2.332 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Boost clocks: 1518 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,116 | 5,248+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.332 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+76% |
| Boost Clock | 1518 MHz+52% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 512 KB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 3 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 84 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 264 GB/s (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) — a 214.3% advantage for the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB and 384-bit on the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 84 GB/s | 264 GB/s+214% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 384-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Decoder: NVDEC 3.0 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3.0 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 80 C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-63% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 275mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65-19% | 80 C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.2+160% | 26.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB came in at $129, while the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 3GB was 56.9% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) vs 17.6 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) — the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers 125.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 3GB (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-57% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7+126% | 17.6 |
| Codename | GP107 | Tahiti |
| Release | May 21 2018 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #440 | #404 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















