FirePro W7100
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W7100
2014Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌519.4% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
- ❌66.2% longer card at 241mm vs 145mm.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 525.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅FirePro W7100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 241mm, a 96mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W7100
The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1392 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,116 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7100 scores 5,065 and the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB reaches 5,116 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W7100) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Raw compute: 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100) vs 2.332 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,065 | 5,116+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+133% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.297 TFLOPS+41% | 2.332 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 112+133% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+56% | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W7100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB carries 3 GB. FirePro W7100 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro W7100 and 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro W7100) vs 768 KB (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+167% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs NVDEC 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 5.0 | NVDEC 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7100 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7100) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95 vs 65.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 241mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | 65-32% |
| Perf/Watt | 33.8 | 68.2+102% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W7100 came in at $799, while the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 3GB was 83.9% cheaper ($670 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.3 (FirePro W7100) vs 39.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB offers 530.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 3GB (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 1050 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $129-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3 | 39.7+530% |
| Codename | Tonga | GP107 |
| Release | August 12 2014 | May 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #406 | #440 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W7100 and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
