
FirePro W7100

GRID M60-2Q
FirePro W7100 vs GRID M60-2Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W7100 vs GRID M60-2Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W7100 vs GRID M60-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W7100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 265.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GRID M60-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌275.5% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W7100 vs GRID M60-2Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W7100
The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.

GRID M60-2Q
The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7100 scores 5,065 and the GRID M60-2Q reaches 5,203 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GRID M60-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W7100) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q). Raw compute: 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,065 | 5,203+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.297 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+46% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 768 KB+71% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-2Q carries 4 GB. FirePro W7100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro W7100 and 128-bit on the GRID M60-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7100) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-2Q) — the GRID M60-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7100 draws 150W versus the GRID M60-2Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro W7100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7100) vs 350W (GRID M60-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 33.8+46% | 23.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W7100 came in at $799, while the GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000. On MSRP, FirePro W7100 was 73.4% cheaper ($2201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.3 (FirePro W7100) vs 1.7 (GRID M60-2Q) — the FirePro W7100 offers 270.6% better value. The newer card here is GRID M60-2Q (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | GRID M60-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-73% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3+271% | 1.7 |
| Codename | Tonga | GM204 |
| Release | August 12 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #406 | #433 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















