FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1650

FirePro W7100

2014Core: 920 MHz

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro W7100

150

5,065

0.0%

Radeon HD 6970

Radeon HD8970M

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

7,869

+55.4%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W7100 is positioned at rank #184 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7100

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

99%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

97%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

96%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

95%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

92%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

88%

#169

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2330%

#184

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

100%

#185

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

100%

#186

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

99%

#188

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

98%

#190

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

97%

#191

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

97%

#193

FirePro M6000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

96%

#196

FirePro M4170

MSRP: $200|Avg: $80

92%

#197

GRID K140Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $500

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W7100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 55.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W7100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-55.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+55.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $114 for the FirePro W7100, it costs 34% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 136.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+136.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($114)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro W7100 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7100 and GeForce GTX 1650

FirePro W7100

The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro W7100 scores 5,065 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 55.4%. The FirePro W7100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W7100) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	5,065	7,869+55%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1792+100%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.297 TFLOPS+10%	2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112+100%	56
L1 Cache	448 KB	896 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The FirePro W7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7100) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	VCE 3.0	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	UVD 5.0	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7100 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7100) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95 vs 70°C.

Feature	FirePro W7100	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	241mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	95	70°C-26%
Perf/Watt	33.8	104.9+210%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W7100 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $114, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 34.2% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.4 (FirePro W7100) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 136.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).