
FirePro W7100

Radeon R9 M295X
FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R9 M295X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R9 M295X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R9 M295X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W7100
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌166.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌24000% longer card at 241mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 170.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 241mm, a 240mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R9 M295X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W7100
The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.

Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W7100 scores 5,065 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W7100) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,065 | 5,150+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.297 TFLOPS+11% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 512 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W7100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X carries 4 GB. FirePro W7100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro W7100 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 5.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W7100 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 50% difference. The FirePro W7100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7100) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 95 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 33.8+64% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W7100 came in at $799, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M295X was 62.5% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.3 (FirePro W7100) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon R9 M295X offers 173% better value.
| Feature | FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $300-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3 | 17.2+173% |
| Codename | Tonga | Amethyst |
| Release | August 12 2014 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #406 | #437 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















