Arc Graphics 140V vs FirePro W7100
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
FirePro W7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 140V is positioned at rank 308 and the FirePro W7100 is on rank 184, so the FirePro W7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2014). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W7100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 140V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W7100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | Xe² (2024) (3nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W7100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $114 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 62% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 157.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+157.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($114) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 140V and FirePro W7100
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
FirePro W7100
The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the FirePro W7100 reaches 5,065 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the FirePro W7100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 1,792 (FirePro W7100).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,168+2% | 5,065 |
| Architecture | Xe² | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 8 | 1792+22300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 140V comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W7100 has 8 GB. The FirePro W7100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the FirePro W7100's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 350W (FirePro W7100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 95.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-90% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-11% | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 344.5+919% | 33.8 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the FirePro W7100 launched at $799 and now averages $114. The FirePro W7100 costs 62% less ($186 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 44.4 (FirePro W7100) — the FirePro W7100 offers 158.1% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 140V | FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-56% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $114-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2 | 44.4+158% |
| Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | Tonga |
| Release | September 24 2024 | August 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #434 | #406 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 140V and FirePro W7100
