Arc Graphics 140V vs FirePro W7100

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

2024Boost: 2050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

FirePro W7100

2014Core: 920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Arc Graphics 140V vs FirePro W7100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 140V vs FirePro W7100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 140V

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $449 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • Delivers 132.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • FirePro W7100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Arc Graphics 140V is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2024 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

FirePro W7100

2014

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 128.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $799 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • 900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc Graphics 140V is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (5,168 vs 5,065), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 140V is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 3nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 140V makes the most sense to buy today. It is $449 cheaper on MSRP at $350 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 132.9% (14.8 vs 6.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc Graphics 140V vs FirePro W7100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 140V

The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.

AMD

FirePro W7100

The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 140V scores 5,168 and the FirePro W7100 reaches 5,065 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 140V is built on Xe² while the FirePro W7100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 1,792 (FirePro W7100).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VFirePro W7100
G3D Mark Score
5,168+2%
5,065
Architecture
Xe²
GCN 3.0
Process Node
3 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
8
1792+22300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 140VFirePro W7100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W7100 carries 8 GB. FirePro W7100 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 140V and 128-bit on the FirePro W7100.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VFirePro W7100
VRAM Capacity
Shared
8 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VFirePro W7100
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140V) vs VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (FirePro W7100).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VFirePro W7100
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
VCE 3.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
UVD 5.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 140V draws 15W versus the FirePro W7100's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 350W (FirePro W7100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 95.

FeatureArc Graphics 140VFirePro W7100
TDP
15W-90%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
241mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C-11%
95
Perf/Watt
344.5+919%
33.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 140V came in at $350, while the FirePro W7100 launched at $799. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 140V was 56.2% cheaper ($449 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (Arc Graphics 140V) vs 6.3 (FirePro W7100) — the Arc Graphics 140V offers 134.9% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 140V (2024 vs 2014).

FeatureArc Graphics 140VFirePro W7100
MSRP
$350-56%
$799
Performance per Dollar
14.8+135%
6.3
Codename
Lunar Lake iGPU
Tonga
Release
September 24 2024
August 12 2014
Ranking
#434
#406

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.